在法学方法 “流派化之争”的背景下,中国民法学者应坚守法教义学这一重要的法学方法。法教义学与社科法学并非此兴彼灭的关系,而是相互包容、合作与借鉴的关系。法律实证研究方法也不是对法教义学的排斥,而是丰富。编纂具有科学性、时代性、民族性的中国民法典,既需要法教义学,也需要社科法学。“多元化”法学方法的践行,是编纂中国民法典的明智之举和当务之急。为此,中国民法应走向“多元合作与互补”的法教义学。 Under the background of jurisprudence “genre dispute ”, Chinese civil law scholars should stick to the important jurisprudence of legal education. Legal doctrine and social science law are not the same relationship, but mutual tolerance, cooperation and reference. Legal empirical research is not exclusive of legal teachings, but rich. The compilation of Chinese civil code that is scientific, contemporary and national requires both law and education as well as social science and law. The practice of “pluralistic” legal methods is a wise move and a top priority for compiling the Chinese Civil Code. For this reason, Chinese civil law should move towards legal doctrine of “multiple cooperation and complementarity.”