论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨射流雾化吸入治疗老年肺炎的临床疗效与护理方法。方法:将2012年6月—2014年6月接受对症治疗的100例老年患者随机分为观察组和对照组,每组50例。两组患者在入院后均予以祛痰、平喘、止咳、纠正水电解质平衡、使用抗生素等常规治疗。对照组在常规治疗的基础上静脉滴注沐舒坦,观察组射流雾化吸入沐舒坦,同时予以综合护理。对比两组患者的康复效果。结果:观察组有效45例(90.0%),无效5例(10.0%);对照组有效35例(70.0%),无效15例(30.0%)。观察组治疗效果明显优于对照组,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:采用射流雾化吸入的方式治疗老年肺炎并予以相应的护理可取得显著的临床疗效。
Objective: To investigate the clinical efficacy and nursing of jet nebulization in the treatment of senile pneumonia. Methods: One hundred elderly patients who received symptomatic treatment from June 2012 to June 2014 were randomly divided into observation group and control group, 50 cases in each group. After admission, both groups were expectorant, antiasthmatic, cough, water and electrolyte balance correction, the use of antibiotics and other conventional treatment. In the control group, mucosolvan was intravenously dripped on the basis of routine treatment, and inhaled mucosolide was inhaled in the observation group, meanwhile comprehensive nursing was given. Compare the rehabilitation effect of two groups of patients. Results: The observation group was effective in 45 cases (90.0%) and ineffective in 5 cases (10.0%). The control group was effective in 35 cases (70.0%) and ineffective in 15 cases (30.0%). The observation group was significantly better than the control group, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion: The treatment of senile pneumonia by jet nebulization and corresponding nursing can achieve significant clinical efficacy.