论文部分内容阅读
华盛顿——鉴于目前连续波高能化学激光器对付战术导弹和近地飞机,其杀伤距离相对地说比较短,仅1—2公里;而对于下一代较高功率的器件来说,最大杀伤距离也只有几公里。为了延长杀伤距离,促使我们对脉冲器件发生兴趣。 脉冲激光器在传输方面具有超过连续波激光器的一些优点,但对于某些特殊应用来说,它又存在若干缺点。 另外,脉冲激光器能够更有效地把它的能量传递到目标中去,在目标内产生冲击效应;而采用连续波激光辐射却不能获得这种效应.
Washington - Considering the current continuous-wave high-energy chemical lasers dealt with tactical missiles and near-Earth aircraft, their kill distances are relatively short, only 1-2 kilometers; while for the next generation of higher power devices, the maximum lethal distance is only A few kilometers. In order to extend the killer distance, prompted us to interest in pulse devices. Pulsed lasers have some advantages over continuous-wave lasers in transmission but have several drawbacks for some special applications. In addition, a pulsed laser can deliver its energy more efficiently to the target, producing an impact effect within the target; however, this effect can not be obtained with CW laser radiation.