我国《刑法》第133条规定了交通肇事罪的具体内容,但并没有对“交通肇事后逃逸”和“因逃逸致人死亡”进行进一步的说明。最高人民法院虽针对此问题进行了解释,但并没有达到统一分歧的效果,因此,在刑法理论界,这两个问题的内容和性质依然是值得讨论的。本文从最基本的主客观方面和法律性质入手,通过剖析和比较,对以上两个问题进行阐释和界定。 Article 133 of the Criminal Law of our country stipulates the specific content of the crime of traffic accident, but does not provide any further explanation for “escape after traffic accident” and “death caused by escape”. Although the Supreme People’s Court explained this issue, it did not achieve the effect of uniform disagreement. Therefore, the content and nature of these two issues in the criminal law theoretical circle are still worth discussing. This article starts with the most basic subjective and objective aspects and the legal nature, and through analysis and comparison, explains and defines the above two issues.