论文部分内容阅读
任何一项改革都有反对者和支持者,普通高中新课程改革也不例外。作为一名老教师,最初我对新课程改革报以不解的态度。我当初以为,高中数学新课程值得诟病的地方很多。例如:原有教材的课程内容组织的线形的梯状序列被打散了,这是否会产生课堂教学的承接性不好的问题?增加了不少教学内容,这是否会进一步加大学生的学业压力?传统数学教学中的六大模块(函数、三角函数、数列、概率、解析几何、立体几何)在新课程中将何去何从?
Any reform has opponents and supporters, the ordinary high school new curriculum reform is no exception. As an old teacher, at first I complained about the new curriculum reform. I had thought that many new high school mathematics courses should be criticized. For example: the original textbook curriculum organized by the linear ladder sequence was broken, which will result in poor acceptance of classroom teaching? Add a lot of teaching content, which will further increase students’ academic pressure ? Six major modules of traditional mathematics teaching (function, trigonometry, sequence, probability, analytic geometry, three-dimensional geometry) in the new course will go from here?