论文部分内容阅读
沙特、海德格、德希达和牟宗三面对人文主义时,彼此持有不同也难于通约的立场。在西方,是寻求人的自由解放;在东方,是寻求人的完成。以牟宗三为代表的新儒家哲学若未能进入哲学论述的后设分析,未能正视语言转向的意义,则其拘于形上学范围里建构圆教的真理,终不免有所“不见”——不见论述与权力、性别、种族的隐喻关系。站在“边界”进行论述分析,也许是新儒家当前面对自我的一项课题。
In the face of humanism, Saudi Arabia, Heidegger, Takydar and Mou Zongsan hold different positions and are difficult to agree on when they face humanism. In the West, it is to seek for the free liberation of people; in the East, it is to seek the completion of human beings. If Neo-Confucianism, represented by Mou Zongsan, fails to enter into the post-analysis of philosophical discourse and fails to address the meaning of linguistic turn, it is inevitable that the Neo- - No discussion about the metaphorical relationship with power, gender, race. Standing on the “boundary” for discussion and analysis may be one of the topics that the Neo-Confucianists are currently facing themselves.