“谁主张,谁举证”是我国民事诉讼的一项基本举证原则,任何人都不能改变。但是,“谁主张,谁举证”并不是说一切事实都要举证,有的事实本来就一目了然,举证反而可能产生歧义。因此,最高人民法院发布的于今年4月1日实施的《关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定》第九条规定了免除当事人举证的事实范围。具体包括以下六个方面:（一）众所周知的事实。这是指一定区域内具有通常经验的普通人都知道的事实。 “Who advocates, who evidence” is a basic proof principle of civil litigation in our country that no one can change. However, “who advocates and who testifies” does not mean that all facts should be proved. Some facts are already plain at a glance. Proof of evidence may be ambiguous. Therefore, Article 9 of the “Provisions on Evidence in Civil Proceedings” issued by the Supreme People’s Court on April 1 this year sets forth the factual exemption from the burden of proof by the parties concerned. Specifically include the following six aspects: (a) the well-known fact. This refers to the fact that average person with common experience in a given area knows.