论文部分内容阅读
对于仲裁制度中是否应设立第三人制度、仲裁第三人是否能够加入仲裁程序,国际上以及我国仲裁界长期以来一直存在两种对立的观点。反对设立仲裁第三人制度的理由主要是设立仲裁第三人与传统仲裁理论相矛盾,违背了仲裁的性质和基本原则。本文将就仲裁第三人制度看似与传统仲裁理论存在的冲突予以一一分析,并在此基础上寻求仲裁第三人制度与传统仲裁理论的结合点,为仲裁第三人制度提供理论上的依据。
Whether the third party system should be set up in the arbitration system and whether the third party should be able to participate in the arbitration proceedings has long been opposed both internationally and in the arbitration community in our country. The reason for opposing the establishment of a third party arbitration system is that the establishment of a third party to arbitration contradicts the theory of traditional arbitration and runs counter to the nature and basic principles of arbitration. This article will analyze the third arbitration system appears to conflict with the traditional theory of arbitration one by one, and on this basis to find the third arbitration arbitration arbitration theory and the combination of the theory of arbitration for the third party system to provide theoretical The basis.