论文部分内容阅读
目的了解铁路警察和监狱警察应对方式的差异。方法采用应对方式问卷对87名广州铁路警察进行调查,并以87名监狱警察作为对照组。结果铁路警察的主要应对方式是解决问题,与监狱警察相类似,但铁路警察的退避、自责得分较高(P<0.05)。女性和青年的应对方式无差异(P>0.05),而男性和中年铁路警察的自责、退避得分较高(P<0.05)。对铁路警察的应对方式进行回归分析发现他们的应对方式与其待遇评价、警龄、是否想转行和婚姻状况密切相关。结论铁路警察的应对方式是积极的,退避和自责可能是与铁路警察职业相适应的应对方式调整。
Objective To understand the difference between coping styles of railway police and prison police. Methods A questionnaire of coping style was used to survey 87 Guangzhou railway policemen, and 87 prison police officers were used as the control group. Results The main response of the railway police officers was to solve the problem, which was similar to that of the prison police. However, the railway police retreated and the self-blame scores were higher (P <0.05). There was no difference in coping styles between women and youth (P> 0.05), while the scores of self-blame and retreat of male and middle-aged railway police officers were higher (P <0.05). Regression analysis of the response methods of railway police found that their coping style is closely related to their evaluation of treatment, seniority, whether they want to change jobs and their marital status. Conclusion The response methods of railway policemen are positive. The retreat and self-blame may be the adjustment of the coping style to suit the railway police career.