论文部分内容阅读
汤姆·雷根提出的动物权利论存在着运用双重逻辑的理论缺陷。雷根除了在立论的核心内容中运用了“理性人标准”和“固有价值假设”的双重逻辑以外,他在论证其理论的进化论依据、反驳罗尔斯的正义论、区分生命价值和固有价值、分析“救生艇案例”以及批判人类食用动物的行为以及相关产业时都存在着运用双重逻辑的缺陷。因此,雷根提出的动物权利论并不具有逻辑上的一致性。
Tom Reagan's theory of animal rights presents the theoretical flaws of applying dual logic. In addition to using the dual logic of “rational human standard” and “natural value hypothesis” in the core content of his argument, Reagan argues for the evolutionary theory of his theory, contradicts Rawls's theory of justice and distinguishes life Value and intrinsic value, there are shortcomings in the application of dual logic when analyzing the “lifeboat case” and the critique of the behavior of human consumption of animals and related industries. Therefore, Reagan's theory of animal rights is not logically consistent.