目的:采用Meta分析在常规治疗基础上增加盆底肌电刺激治疗脊髓损伤后神经源性膀胱的效果。方法:在Pubmed/Medline，Embase，Cochrane系统评价数据库，CINAHL，中国知网，维普和万方中，全面检索2019年3月31日以前发表的随机对照试验。对符合纳入标准的随机对照试验，采用Meta分析方法计算总体效果。结果:本研究共纳入随机对照试验7项，样本量共计319例。汇总分析表明，在常规治疗基础上，加用盆底肌电刺激有助于增加患者膀胱容量(WMD＝68.89, 95%CI [35.04，102.74])，减少残余尿量(WMD＝-25.68, 95%CI [-34.03，-17.32])，增加脊髓损伤后神经源性膀胱患者平均单次排尿量(WMD＝33.41, 95%CI [9.60, 57.23])，减少排尿次数(WMD＝-3.44, 95%CI [-4.18，-2.70])及平均漏尿次数(WMD＝-1.74, 95%CI [-2.85, -0.62])，并降低下尿路症状评分(WMD＝-6.60, 95%CI [-8.31，-4.88])。结论:在常规治疗基础上增加盆底肌电刺激对脊髓损伤后神经源性膀胱效果优于常规治疗。“,”Objective:To determine the effect of pelvic floor electrical stimulation combined with conventional treatment on neurogenic bladder dysfunction after spinal cord injury.Methods:The Pubmed/Medline, Embase, Cochrane, CINAHL, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, CQVIP and Wanfang databases were electronically searched for reports published before April 2019 of randomized and controlled trials testing the effect of electrical stimulation of the pelvic floor on neurogenic bladder after spinal cord injury. Meta-analysis of all the reports collected was performed.Results:Seven randomized and controlled trials with 319 patients were identified. Together they showed that compared with conventional treatment, pelvic floor muscle stimulation better increased bladder capacity and reduced the volume of residual urine. Average single urination output was increased, while the frequency of urination decreased along with episodes of urinary incontinence. Average lower urinary tract symptoms scores were also significantly better.Conclusions:Electrical stimulation of the pelvic floor combined with conventional therapy may be more effective than conventional therapy alone in alleviating the symptoms of neurogenic bladder.