一个学生的作文本上有这么两句话:“我认为参加农业生产是没有出息的。”“我总是考虑着前途的问题。”某老师费了一番心思后,改为“我认为参加农业生产是没有前途的。”“我时时刻刻想着前途的问题。”另外一个学生在作文里慨叹“前途”的“渺茫”,而某老师却只在文章后面批了“文字清顺”四个大字。人们问他为什么只批这样几个字呢?为什么不纠正学生的错误思想呢?这位老师还理直气壮地说:“我是语文教员,不是政治教员,我批的是文章,不是思想。”解放已经快八年了,这样的教师现在应该不多了吧。但是,把教 There are two sentences in a student’s text: “I think there is no chance to participate in agricultural production.” “I always think about the future.” After a teacher took a lot of thought, he changed to “I think that There is no future in agricultural production.” “I always think about the future.” Another student lamented the “wonderfulness” of “prospects” in the composition, and a teacher only approved the “clear text” after the article. Four characters. People asked him why he only approved such words. Why did he not correct the student’s wrong thoughts? The teacher also said with integrity: “I am a language teacher, not a political teacher. I have approved articles, not ideas.” Liberation It has been almost eight years now. Such teachers should not be much now. However, teaching