论文部分内容阅读
法官解释法律的过程是抽象的法律向具体个案裁判转化的过程 ,从哲学解释学的角度看 ,该过程经历了理解、解释和判断三个要素的相互作用 ,其间充满个体的主观性、创造性和群体的参与、程序的约束以及社会法律价值观念衡量等因素 ,而个案裁判是这一过程呈现的最终结果。因而为使判决具有说服力 ,法官在判决中说明理由就十分必要 ,这是满足判决正当化 ,实现法治所必需的 ,也正是我国审判改革的重点所在
Judges interpret the process of law as the process of transformation from abstract law to case-specific adjudication. From the perspective of philosophical hermeneutics, the process has undergone the interaction of three elements: understanding, interpretation and judgment. In the meantime, it is full of individual subjectivity, creativity and Group participation, procedural constraints and the measurement of social legal values and other factors, and case adjudication is the ultimate result of this process. Therefore, in order to persuade the verdict, it is necessary for the judge to explain the reasons in the verdict, which is necessary to satisfy the justification of the verdict and realize the rule of law, and it is also the focus of the trial reform in our country