常见的法官后语定义有很多,它们都强调法官后语是对当事人的道德说教,都声称法官后语没有法律约束力,但在法官后语制作主体、具体位置和内容等方面存在很大不同。梳理其差异,探讨其合理性,最后厘定法官后语乃合议庭或独任法官附属于裁判文书规范性格式之后一段对当事人给予道德教育而不具有法律约束力的简短文字。 There are many common post-judge definitions, all of them stress that the post-judge’s postulation is the moral preaching to the clients, all claim that the post-judge’s speech is not legally binding, but there is a big difference in the subject, specific location and content of the judge’s post-production . Combing their differences and discussing their rationality. Finally, it is determined that the last sentence of the judge is not a legally binding short version of the moral education given to the parties after the collegiate bench or the sole judge is attached to the normative format of the judicial documents.