论文部分内容阅读
墨线图1是双干榕盆景《相依》原桩相,改坯时有两个方案:一是截去副干,改成单干;二是将主干的A、C、D三侧枝及副干的E、G枝截去,育成双干式。对比分析,实施方案一后,A枝明显大于主干,D枝向前后方生长,与主干不协调。方案二能改出较理想的双干型桩坯,两干头根相连又各有根爪,长相基本相似,一粗一细,一高一矮,各干刚中有柔,粗细变化均匀,主副干争让适度。不足之处是:截去D、E枝后,伤疤过大,有碍观赏。
Ink Figure 1 is double dry Banyan “dependency” the original pile phase, there are two options to change billet: First, cut off the trunk, into a single trunk; the second is the main A, C, D three branches and deputy E, G branches cut off, bred double dry. Comparative analysis, after the implementation of a program, A branch was significantly larger than the trunk, D branch forward and backward growth, and uncoordinated trunk. Option two can be more ideal to change out of the double-dry pile billet, the two dried roots connected with each root and claw, looks basically similar to a thick and thin, a tall and a short, the dry just in a soft, uniform thickness changes, The main counter-war so that moderate. Shortcomings are: cut off D, E branches, the scars too large, hinder viewing.