论文部分内容阅读
目的比较改良乳腺癌手术与传统乳腺癌手术的临床利弊。方法 50例乳腺癌患者,根据手术方案不同分为观察组和对照组,各25例。对照组接受传统乳腺癌手术,观察组接受改良乳腺癌手术。比较两组手术效果。结果观察组术中出血量、手术时长、住院时长分别为(110.4±14.3)ml、(102.1±16.2)min、(10.2±2.1)d,均优于对照组(153.8±21.4)ml、(137.7±32.5)min、(14.7±3.5)d(P<0.05)。观察组术后并发症发生率8.0%、复发率4.0%、乳房外观良好率92.0%优于对照组32.0%、24.0%、0(P<0.05)。结论改良乳腺癌手术与传统切除手术相比,临床治疗效果良好,值得推广使用。
Objective To compare the clinical advantages and disadvantages of modified breast cancer surgery and traditional breast cancer surgery. Methods Fifty patients with breast cancer were divided into observation group and control group according to different surgical plans, with 25 cases in each. The control group underwent conventional breast cancer surgery and the observation group underwent modified breast cancer surgery. Compare the two groups of surgical results. Results The intraoperative blood loss, operation time and length of hospital stay in the observation group were (110.4 ± 14.3) ml and (102.1 ± 16.2) min and (10.2 ± 2.1) days, respectively, which were significantly higher than those in the control group (153.8 ± 21.4) and 137.7 ± 32.5) min, (14.7 ± 3.5) d (P <0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group was 8.0%, the recurrence rate was 4.0%, and the good appearance rate of breast was 92.0%, which was significantly higher than that of the control group (32.0%, 24.0%, 0) (P <0.05). Conclusion Improved breast cancer surgery compared with conventional resection, the clinical treatment of good results, it is worth promoting the use.