整理国故运动在传统文化的传承及向现代的转型等方面成绩显著,但不足之处也显而易见。在整理国故运动实际过程中,研究的范围过于局限于考据与辨伪,拘泥考据一度成为诸多国故学者的明显倾向,以致不仅出现目标与方法的脱节、理想与现实的背离,并且对当时学术风气产生某些消极影响;还有学者认为整理国故运动坚持以“评判的态度”“重新估定一切价值”的研究取向,对凝聚精神力量、团结抗战造成不利影响。在整理国故运动中,疑古思潮与胡适的“存疑主义”、“拿证据来”大为流行。对孙子兵法的考证与辨伪在此背景下展开。学者们通过更加全面与详尽的考证,指出今之存世《孙子兵法》十三篇成书于战国中后期,对于有无孙子其人亦存疑问。关于孙子兵法的考证与辨伪引起了另一部分学者针锋相对的反驳。围绕孙子兵法辨伪展开的这场争论从一个侧面暴露了整理国故运动的不足,亦涉及了对传统兵学文化地位作用的再认识与评价。 There are notable achievements in sorting out the national heritage movement in the tradition of traditional culture and its transformation to the modern era, but the inadequacies are obvious. In the actual process of sorting out the national movement, the scope of the study is too limited to the test and the pseudo-falsification. The test of detention was once the obvious tendency of many scholars in the country so that not only the separation of the goal and the method, the departure from the ideal and the reality, Academic atmosphere has some negative effects; some scholars think that finishing the country movement insists on the research attitude of “judging attitude” and “revaluing all values”, which adversely affects the cohesion of the spiritual forces and uniting the war of resistance. In sorting out the national security movement, the trend of doubtful thoughts and Hu Shi’s “Doubtfulism” and “getting evidence” have become very popular. Textual research on the Art of War and the pseudo-checks in this context. Through more comprehensive and exhaustive textual research, scholars have pointed out that there are thirteen chapters in the present age of the “Art of War” that were written in the late Warring States period. Textual research on the Art of War and the pseudo-pseudo caused another tit for tat opposition. The controversy surrounding the art of war by Sun Tzu reveals from one aspect the inadequacies of arranging the movement of the country and also involves the re-understanding and evaluation of the role of the traditional military culture.