论文部分内容阅读
随着“西学东渐”的不断深入,中西文化的会通、融合的步伐不断加快,西方的历史编纂理论、体裁体例等开始输入到近代中国,客观上成为推动中国历史编纂学向近代化转变的重要标志。正统论作为传统历史编纂学的重要理论,在近代出现了颇为有趣的演变,即在前期(1840-1860年)仍受到史学家的关注,并在具体的史书实践中得到贯彻;从1860年到新史学思潮兴起前,一些史学家已经认识到正统论的不足,开始质疑正统论的合理性与权威性,希望将正统论的消极作用从历史编纂中剥离开来;新史学思潮兴起后,正统论遭到近代史学家的尖锐批判,并逐渐淡出历史舞台。探索近代正统论的演进路径及其对中国历史编纂学的影响,对于我们建构具有民族特色的中国历史编纂学体系具有重要意义,它使我们认识到中国古代不仅有丰富绚烂的史书体裁、体例,在历史编纂理论方面也有颇具特色的理论体系,后者是支撑中国历史编纂学向前发展的重要动力。
With the continuous deepening of “learning from east to west”, the pace of convergence and integration of Chinese and Western cultures has been accelerating. Western historical compilation theories and genres began to be imported into modern China and objectively promoted the compilation of Chinese historical compilation into modern times An important symbol of change. Orthodoxy, as an important theory of traditional historiography, appeared quite interesting evolution in modern times. It was still concerned by historians in the early period (1840-1860) and was implemented in the practice of specific history books. From 1860 Before the rise of the new historiography thought, some historians had realized the deficiency of orthodoxy and began to question the rationality and authority of orthodoxy, hoping to separate the negative effect of orthodoxy from the compilation of history. After the rise of the new historiography, Orthodoxy was sharply criticized by modern historians and gradually faded from the stage of history. To explore the evolution path of modern orthodoxy and its influence on Chinese historical compilation is of great significance for us to construct a Chinese historical compiling system with national characteristics. It makes us realize that ancient China not only had rich and glorious history, genre, There are also quite distinctive theoretical systems in the theory of historical compilation, which is an important motivation for supporting the development of Chinese historical compilation.