论文部分内容阅读
关于行政拨交工会经费的理论问题，过去我们曾发过多篇文章，一致认为 2％工会经费是劳动者活劳动消耗的补偿，是劳动力价值的一部分。在这次学会年会上，郭永旗同志撰写的“行政拨交工会经费的理论依据”一文，突破“劳动价值补偿论”的传统说法，提出行政拨交工会经费，不是职工劳动力价值的补偿，而是社会剩余产品的一种分配。他认为，根据马克思主义的再生产理论，劳动者付出等量劳动，应取得等量报酬，劳动报酬具有私有性，应由劳动者个人自由支配，把工会经费说成是劳动者活劳动消耗的补偿，在理论上是站不住的，是错误的。这一论点是否正确，希望引起广大读者进一步思考和讨论。
In the past, we have sent many articles on the theoretical issue of the administrative funds allocated to the trade unions. They all agreed that the 2% union funds are the compensation for laborers’ living labor costs and are part of the labor force’s value. At the annual meeting of this society, Comrade Guo Yongqi wrote the article entitled “Theoretical Basis for Exchanging Funds for the Administration of Labor Unions”, which broke through the traditional theory of compensation for labor value and proposed that the administrative funds appropriated by trade unions should not be the compensation for the labor value of workers. It is a distribution of social surplus products. He believes that according to the Marxist theory of reproduction, workers pay equal amounts of labor, should obtain the same amount of remuneration, personal remuneration for labor should be freely controlled by the individual workers, the labor union funds as labor compensation for labor consumption, It is wrong in theory to stand still. This argument is correct, hoping to arouse readers to think and discuss further.