论文部分内容阅读
通过关于德里达逝世一份意味深长的讣告 ,2 0 0 4年 1 0月下旬 ,以《纽约时报》为载体 ,引发了一场关于德里达的哲学对我们这个世界究竟意味着什么的讨论。这场讨论的实质在于 ,德里达的解构精神究竟是一种一味摧毁形而上学的力量 ,还是通过对这种形而上学传统的分析 ,指出“一分为二”式的“二元论”的片面性 ,以致所导致的 ,从古至今绵延不断的一种固执的思维定式。德里达试图告诉我们 ,形而上学和古典辩证法传统在把一对和多对范畴相互对应、提升、同化过程中 ,势必排除或遗漏掉许多可能是更为重要的要素 ,因为这些要素可能是使事物得以出场和传播的更为真实的方式。解构不是破坏 ,不是摧毁 ,不是在消灭一个旧世界的基础上建立一个新世界。应该把解构理解为事物在出场或传播过程中其结构的某种实际上的变形 ,一种实际效果。
Adoption of a meaningful obituary on the death of Derrida led to a discussion of what Derrida’s philosophy really meant for our world by the New York Times in late October 2004. The essence of this discussion lies in whether Derrida’s deconstruction spirit is a force destroying metaphysics blindly or by analyzing this metaphysical tradition and pointing out the one-sidedness of the “dichotomy” binary theory, which leads to , A stubborn way of thinking that has lasted since ancient times. Derrida tries to tell us that the traditions of metaphysics and classical dialectics are bound to rule out or omit many elements that may be more important in the process of reciprocal one-to-many correspondence, ascension and assimilation, as these elements may be Play and spread more real way. Deconstruction is not destruction, not destruction, not a new world based on the elimination of an old world. Deconstruction should be understood as something in appearance or communication in the process of its actual deformation, a practical effect.