论文部分内容阅读
9月9日,最高人民法院、最高人民检察院公布了涉及网络谣言的若干司法解释。在网络谣言日益泛滥的今天,两高的做法回应了民众的关切。但这刚刚出炉的司法解释也不可避免地引发部分执法者和民众在理解上的混乱。9月17日,甘肃天水张家川县警方刑拘一名“散布谣言”的初中生,这一举动有很大的跑偏之嫌。一、“转500次可判刑”的司法解释本有严格限定1、“转500次可判刑”针对的是诽谤罪,而不是所有网络谣言9月9日两高出台的十条司法解释中,以第二条第一款中“同一诽谤信息实际被点击、浏览次数达到五千次以上,或者被转发次数达到五百次以上的”这段字眼最为引入注目。在媒体报道中,该条款往往被浓缩为“诽谤信息转发500次以上,或点击、浏览达到5000次以上即入刑”。在整
On September 9, the Supreme People’s Court and the Supreme People’s Procuratorate released a number of judicial interpretations concerning Internet rumors. Today, with the proliferation of rumors on the Internet, two high practices have responded to public concerns. However, the newly released judicial interpretation will inevitably lead to some confusion in understanding between law enforcement officials and the public. September 17, Zhangjiachuan County, Tianshui, Gansu police arrested a “spread of rumors,” junior high school students, this move has a lot of misconduct. First, the “Judgment of 500 Sentences” has a strict limit 1. Judgment of “Judgment of 500 Judgments” is for defamation instead of all Internet rumors Ten judiciaries promulgated on September 9 In the explanation, the phrase “the same libel message was actually clicked on for more than 5,000 visits or more than 500 times forwarded in the first paragraph of Article 2” was most noticed. In media reports, the article is often condensed into “defamatory information transmitted more than 500 times, or click, browse to reach more than 5000 that is”. In the whole