论文部分内容阅读
刑事诉讼法的结构准则强调的是以探求案件真实为己任的国家司法权运行模式,以国家司法机关有探求案件真实的义务原则为基础。虽然公诉机关和辩护方有权当庭向证人和鉴定人发问,有权(通过查证申请)促使法院进一步提取证据,尤其是在特定的前提下,有权提出自己的证据——他们完全可以积极推动诉讼材料的收集,但是在该程序中,最终认定证据是否具有证明效力以及对不具有证明效力的非法证据排除却是法院的职责。在这个环节当中,如何认定非法证据以及如何适用我国刑事诉讼法修正案46条的非法证据排除规则却是整个司法活动的核心环节。基于此本文仅就非法证据排除规则的适用问题作以技术性探讨,期望透过本文的研究能够对实践提供帮助。
The structural guidelines of the Code of Criminal Procedure emphasize the mode of operation of the judicial power of the country that seeks the truth of the case and are based on the principle that the judicial organs of the State have a true obligation to seek the case. Although the Public Prosecution and defense parties have the right to challenge the witness and the expert in court to power the court to further extract the evidence (through the application of the petition), and in particular on specific premises have the right to present their own evidence that they are fully motivated The collection of litigation material, however, is the court’s responsibility in the process to ultimately determine whether the evidence is proving or not, and to exclude unlawful evidence of non-demonstrable validity. In this link, how to identify illegal evidence and how to apply the 46 rules of the Criminal Procedure Law to amend the illegal exclusion rules is the core of the entire judicial activities. Based on this, this paper only discusses the application of the rule of exclusion of illegal evidence, and hopes that the research of this article can help practice.