论文部分内容阅读
自“学习型组织”、“学习型城市”和“学习型社会”进入教育词汇,“终身学习”逐渐成为超国家的政策中心字眼,然而在政策话语中,却存在把终身学习视为标准真理的虚夸言辞,它遮蔽了终身学习的建构特性。为此,在“价值”、“旨向”、“动力”和“组织”的框架下,对终身学习进行多向度解析,指出:终身学习处于价值语境下的“善”与“非善”、旨向视野下的“人力资本”与“社会资本”、动力境域下的“个人需求”与“社会驱动”、组织背景下的“工具理性”与“价值理性”的张力之中,不存在统一和静止的真理标准。
From the “learning organization”, “learning city” and “learning society” into the vocabulary of education, “lifelong learning” has gradually become the super-national center of policy, but in the policy discourse, but Lifelike rhetoric exists that regards lifelong learning as the standard truth, which obscures the constructive features of lifelong learning. To this end, under the framework of “Value ”, “Purpose ”, “Motivation ” and “Organization ”, multidimensional analysis of lifelong learning is made, pointing out that lifelong learning is in a value context “Good ” and “Non - good ” in the vision of “human capital ” and “social capital ” under the vision field, “personal demand ” and “social drive In the organizational context, the tension between ”instrumental rationality“ and ”“ value rationality ”does not exist. There is no uniform and static truth standard.