论文部分内容阅读
从非形式逻辑进路看,说服型对话理论和批判性讨论理论可以分析庭审对话的特点和过程,尤其是审判方的论证评估。从对话逻辑进路看,说服型对话系统主要关注起诉方、应诉方和审判方的会话行为和承诺,但是忽略了对论证的评估。庭审对话的逻辑分析应当吸收这两种进路的优点,发展包含审判方的论证评估和会话行为的庭审对话理论。
From the perspective of non-formal logic, persuasive dialogue theory and critical discussion theory can analyze the characteristics and process of court-trial dialogue, especially the judgment of the trial party. From the perspective of dialogue logic, the persuasive dialogue system mainly focuses on the conversational behaviors and promises of prosecutors, respondents and trial parties, but ignores the assessment of arguments. The logical analysis of trial dialogue should absorb the advantages of these two approaches and develop a trial trial dialogue theory that includes the judgment evaluation and conversation of the trial parties.