论文部分内容阅读
美国战略和预算评估中心(CSBA)的马克·冈津格和布赖恩·克拉克最近推出一份新的研究报告称,鉴于美国政府习惯于以简单方式看待战争,决策者可能会就在诸如叙利亚、伊拉克和也门之类的地方发动空中战役的战略价值进行辩论,并想当然地假设,灵巧炸弹都会以1枚炸弹摧毁1个目标的效果命中目标。报告认为光靠灵巧炸弹之类的智能武器打击目标不再是可靠的解决之道。报告认为,对抗措施正在变得越来越复杂,也越来越通常,先进的防空导弹不
Recently Mark CSG and Brian Clarke of the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Evaluation (CSBA) recently launched a new study that states that as the U.S. government is accustomed to taking a simple look at the war, policymakers may decide to take action in areas such as Syria, Iraq and Yemen, and to assume, of course, the assumption that deft bombs will each hit a target with one bomb to hit the target. The report argues that targeting smart targets such as smart bombs is no longer a reliable solution. The report argues that countermeasures are becoming more and more complex, and increasingly common, that advanced anti-aircraft missiles do not