论文部分内容阅读
在我国流行的几部哲学著作中,当讲完唯物辩证法三大规律之后,都专章讲述“原因与结果”等“唯物辩证法基本范畴”,作为三大规律的展开和补充。十九所高等院校编写的《马克思主义哲学原理》,把哲学范畴分为反映“对象或实体”、“属性或形式”、“关系”三大类,其中认为,唯物辩证法的范畴是反映关系的范畴(其特性是具有对偶性)。我认为,这种观点有商榷之必要,因为,其一,这种视唯物辩证法范畴是“关系范畴”的观点,在逻辑上是讲不通的;其二;与之相适应,在传统的教材中对于“原因和结果”等范畴之间的联系在体系安排上也是不适当的。
In the few philosophical writings prevalent in our country, after the three major laws of materialist dialectics are finished, all the chapters tell the basic categories of materialist dialectics such as “cause and result” as the three major laws. The “Principles of Marxist Philosophy” written by 19 institutions of higher learning divide the categories of philosophy into three categories reflecting “objects or entities,” “attributes or forms,” and “relations.” In the view of them, the category of materialist dialectics reflects the relationship (Its characteristic is duality). I think it is necessary to discuss this view because, firstly, this category of dialectical materialism is a view of “relational category” and is logically impractical; secondly, in conformity with the traditional teaching materials The link between categories such as “causes and consequences” is also inadequate in terms of institutional arrangements.