论文部分内容阅读
在土地革命初期,联共(布)、共产国际在指导中国革命中表现了这样一种思路:通过革命军队和工农武装起义,迅速占领广州,建立苏维埃政权,汇合广东各地的农民暴动,首先取得革命在广东一省的胜利。然后,再由湖南、湖北重新进行北伐,将革命向北推进,掀起革命新高潮。这种思路简言之,就是广东“速胜论”。为此,联共(布)、共产国际在中国土地革命初期的三大起义中,最重视的是广州起义,一度把占领广州,取得革命在广东的胜利当做指导中国革命的中心工作。联共(布)、共产国际这种思路是脱离中国实际的,广州起义的失败,是这种思路的终结。
In the early days of the agrarian revolution, the Communist Party (Bolshevism) and the Comintern showed such a mentality in guiding the Chinese revolution by armed insurrection by the revolutionary army and workers and peasants, the rapid occupation of Guangzhou, the establishment of the Soviet government and the integration of peasant riots throughout Guangdong. First, Revolution victory in a province of Guangdong. Then, again, Hunan and Hubei resumed the Northern Expedition, pushing the revolution northward and setting off a new upsurge of revolution. In short, this kind of thinking is Guangdong’s “quick victory theory.” Therefore, of the three major uprisings in the early days of the Agrarian Revolution in China, the Communist Party (BPL) and the Comintern focused most on the Guangzhou Uprising. They once took the occupation of Guangzhou and the victory of the revolution in Guangdong as the centerpiece of the Chinese revolution. The Communist Party (Bolshevik) and the Comintern this idea are divorced from China’s reality. The failure of the Guangzhou uprising is the end of this line of thinking.