论文部分内容阅读
不同国家因历史传统、文化特色不同而实行的陪审制度在形式上和发展水平上有所不同,但非职业法官审判参与度的背后逻辑主要还是基于市场经济的民主发展水平和民主表现形式。民事诉讼中人民陪审员审判参与度的构建应回归民主本质,让其对案件事实认定问题进行判断与表决;对于法律适用等其他问题,人民陪审员则主要起到民主参与与监督的作用。在我国,人民陪审员审判参与度的过渡性构建应兼顾不同地域法院及不同审级法院所面对的现实差异。
The jury system in different countries is different in form and level of development due to different historical traditions and cultural characteristics. However, the logic behind the participation of non-professional judges is mainly based on the level of democratic development and democratic representation of the market economy. The construction of the people’s jury trial participation in civil lawsuit should return to the essence of democracy and allow it to judge and vote on the issues of factual determination of the case. For other issues such as the application of law, the people’s jury members mainly play the role of democratic participation and supervision. In our country, the transitional construction of people’s jury trial participation should take into account the real differences faced by different district courts and different trial courts.