苏亮《熊大木书坊主身份的考证尚难动摇》一文,对陈旭东《熊大木身份新考》关于熊大木是否为书坊主的考证从论点到论据等多方面提出不同看法,有些批评意见是中肯的,有些则失之偏颇。文章对熊大木身份“研究回顾”又做一番检讨,对苏亮的主要不同意见作出答复,认为熊大木不是书坊主的观点依然成木身份“研究立。 Su Liang, ”the text of Xiong Da Mu Shu Fang’s identity is still hard to shake,“ a text on Chen Xudong’s ”Xiong Da Mu Identity New Test“ on whether Xiong Da Mu’s textual criticism from the argument to the argument and other aspects put forward different views, some criticisms are pertinent Some, however, are biased. The article also made a review on the identity of Xiong Dakou and the ”Research Review" and replied to the main differences between Su Liang and held that Xiong Daku is not a bookmaker’s point of view.