论文部分内容阅读
社会科学解释的核心问题是意义理解和因果解释之间的关系。韦伯的理想类型方法试图融合二者关系,其关于意义、价值中立原则和意向性因果关系的观点均受到当代社会科学哲学的批评。针对因果机制探索何以可能,批判实在论提出了本体论和方法论上的改进。它提出分层的本体论,将因果机制放到了本体论层面,而因果关系则是“人为封闭系统”中的一种认知上的关系,由此澄清了因果机制和因果关系,同时,它提出的RRRE模式和MIT的方法论核心虽然都是回溯,但RRRE模式更契合最佳解释推理对回溯的推进,亦即通过可爱性原则和可能性的关系来反映理解和解释的互动关系。
The core issue of social science interpretation is the relationship between meaning understanding and causal interpretation. Weber’s ideal-type approach attempts to fuse the two, and his views on meaning, the principle of value neutrality, and the causal causal intention are both critiqued by contemporary philosophy of social science. To explore the possibility of causal mechanism, critical realism proposed ontology and methodological improvements. It puts forward a layered ontology that places the causal mechanism on the ontological level, whereas causality is a cognitive relationship in the “closed system of man”, thereby clarifying the causal mechanism and the causal relationship Although RRRE model and MIT methodological core are both retrospective, the RRRE model is more in line with the best explanation of reasoning for retrospective promotion, that is, the relationship between understanding and interpretation is reflected through the relationship between the principle of loyalty and the possibility.