论文部分内容阅读
目的评价汉化版情商问卷在大学生中使用的信度和效度,为情商研究提供有效的测量工具。方法采用汉化版情商问卷及Young网络成瘾量表,对选修北京某医科大学《生活技能教育与心理健康促进》课程和河北某理工科大学《健康与发展》课程的大学生共556名进行问卷调查。采用Cronbach’sα系数法、相关分析和因子分析评价量表的信度和结构效度,用Young网络成瘾诊断量表评价区分效度。结果汉化版情商问卷的Cronbach’sα系数为0.887。各条目与总量表得分间相关系数在0.19～0.72间(P值均<0.01)。探索性因子分析提取了9个因子(累计解释方差为50.78%),仅有个别题目的归属与情商问卷的假设不一致。量表除“快乐”外所有的维度和总分上,有无网瘾者的得分差异均有统计学意义(P值均<0.05)。结论中文版情商问卷有较好的信度和区分效度,但是仍然需要扩大样本在将来的研究中更深入地验证并改进其结构效度。
Objective To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the emotional intelligence questionnaire in college students and provide an effective measurement tool for emotional intelligence research. Methods A total of 556 undergraduates who participated in the course of “Life Skills Education and Mental Health Promotion” at a certain medical university in Beijing and the “Health and Development” course of a certain science and engineering university in Hebei were surveyed by using the Chinese version of EQ questionnaire and Young Internet Addiction Inventory. . Cronbach’s α coefficient method, correlation analysis and factor analysis were used to evaluate the reliability and structural validity of the scale. The Young Internet Addiction Diagnostic Questionnaire was used to evaluate the discriminant validity. Results The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the Chinese version of the questionnaire was 0.887. The correlation coefficient between each item and the total scale score ranged from 0.19 to 0.72 (P <0.01). Exploratory factor analysis extracted nine factors (cumulative explained variance of 50.78%), only the assignment of individual questions and the hypothesis of the EQ questionnaire are inconsistent. There were significant differences in the scores of all the scales and total points except “Happy” in the scale with or without addiction (P <0.05). Conclusion The Chinese version of EQ questionnaire has good reliability and discriminant validity. However, it is still necessary to expand the sample to further verify and improve the validity of its structure in future studies.