论文部分内容阅读
司法解释是法治国家重要的法律渊源。在我国，司法解释的现状却存在种种不尽如人意之处：其一为最高人民法院的司法解释与最高人民检察院的司法解释之间的“唇齿之战”；其二为高检院司法解释权的存废之争；其三是个别司法解释严重侵犯了其他行业的权利。今年１月３１日，最高人民法院发布《关于审判人员严格执行回避制度的若干规定》后，编辑部陆续收到了全国各地律师的大量来信来稿，针对其第５条的反对呼声颇高。希望本期关于司法解释的特别策划能够引起立法机关和司法机关的重视，以完善我国的司法制度。
Judicial interpretation is an important source of law in a country ruled by law. In our country, there are various unsatisfactory situations in the judicial interpretation: one is the “lip-war” between the judicial interpretation of the Supreme People’s Court and the judicial interpretation of the Supreme People’s Procuratorate; the other is the judicial interpretation of the Supreme People’s Procuratorate The third is individual judicial interpretation of a serious violation of the rights of other industries. On January 31 this year, after the Supreme People’s Court issued the “Several Provisions on the Strict Implementation of the Avoidance System by Judges,” the editorial department successively received a large number of letters from lawyers in various parts of the country. The opposition to Article 5 is rather high. I hope this special issue of judicial interpretation can draw the attention of the legislature and the judiciary in order to perfect our judicial system.