传统的诉讼模式强调两造角色平等、武器对等,却很少关注到角色掩盖下不同性别的具体人的实质平等,从而导致平等在刑事诉讼过程中流于形式。通过质疑传统刑事诉讼不分诉讼主体性别的模式定位,可以发现问题的实质及危害,进而合理建构有条件的差异性平等,同时引起学者就性别问题于诉讼中尤其刑事诉讼中的运用给予更多关注。 The traditional mode of litigation emphasizes equality between two roles and weapons, but seldom pays attention to the substantive equality of specific people of different genders under the cover of roles, resulting in the formalization of equality in criminal proceedings. By questioning the traditional criminal procedure regardless of the gender orientation of litigants, we can find out the substance and harms of the problems, and then reasonably construct the conditional differential equality. At the same time, we can give more help to scholars on the application of gender in litigation, especially in criminal litigation attention.