论文部分内容阅读
本文对物质污染和符号污染进行了比较 ,前者指生活基本资源的污染 ,即水、土壤和空气的污染 ;后者指符号过程中基本资源的污染 ,即渠道、符号物和信息 ,代码、能指和所指 ,以及语境、发送者和接受者的污染。文章指出 ,符号污染干扰了符号过程 ,正如物质污染干扰生活的基本过程一样。就其能够对当前社会的人们制造压力而言 ,这两种污染是相似的。文章认为 ,符号学能够提供必要的概念工具 ,用来制定可以减少符号污染的政策。然而 ,正如文中所述 ,要使符号污染的一般概念 (如“与渠道相关的干扰”、“与指号过程相关的干扰”、“与情境相关的干扰”)可操作化、标准化 ,尚需进一步的研究
This article compares material and symbolic pollution, the former refers to the pollution of basic living resources, namely water, soil and air pollution; the latter refers to the process of symbolic pollution of the basic resources, that is, channels, symbols and information, code, can Refers to and refers to, as well as the context, sender and recipient of pollution. The article points out that symbolic pollution interferes with the symbolic process just as the material pollution interferes with the basic process of living. The two types of pollution are similar in their ability to create pressure on people in the current society. The article argues that semiotics can provide the necessary conceptual tools to develop policies that reduce the pollution of symbols. However, as noted in the paper, the general concept of symbolic pollution (such as “channel-related interference”, “process-related interference” and “context-related interference” Further research