论文部分内容阅读
目的对心脏彩超与心电图对诊断冠心病的临床价值进行对比分析。方法采用随机抽选法从本院2015年1月~2016年1月期间收治的疑似冠心病患者中抽取100例作为研究对象,分别给予所有患者心脏彩超(UCG)与心电图检查(ECG)。结果 UCG检查灵敏度为68.09%,特异度为66.04%,误诊率为33.96%,漏诊率为31.91%,诊断的符合率为67.00%;而ECG检查灵敏度为82.86%,特异度为46.67%,误诊率为53.33%,漏诊率为17.14%,诊断的符合率为72.00%;两种检查方式的诊断结果差异明显(P<0.05)。结论在冠心病的诊断中心脏彩超和心电图有着良好的诊断价值,不过误诊率、漏诊率较高,临床应根据情况使用,确保诊断的准确性。
Objective To compare the clinical value of echocardiography and electrocardiogram in the diagnosis of coronary heart disease. Methods A total of 100 patients with suspected coronary heart disease admitted from January 2015 to January 2016 in our hospital were selected as randomized study. All patients were given UCG and ECG. Results The sensitivity of UCG was 68.09%, the specificity was 66.04%, the misdiagnosis rate was 33.96%, the rate of misdiagnosis was 31.91%, the coincidence rate of diagnosis was 67.00%. The sensitivity of UCG was 82.86% and the specificity was 46.67% , The rate of misdiagnosis was 17.14%. The coincidence rate of diagnosis was 72.00%. There was significant difference between the two examinations (P <0.05). Conclusion Dysuria and electrocardiogram have a good diagnostic value in the diagnosis center of coronary heart disease, but the rate of misdiagnosis and misdiagnosis is high. The clinical application should be based on the situation to ensure the accuracy of diagnosis.