论文部分内容阅读
洪子诚老师的著作大巧若拙,我们不断从他的著述中获得知识上的刺激和方法上的启示,其沉静、节制、细密、干净的风格,鲜明地区别于经常情热到接近昏迷的当代评论。他将当代文学评论转变成为当代文学研究,使当代文学研究具有了真正的学术研究品格。有人曾说,洪子诚老师的研究方法接近于福柯的知识考古学,但洪子诚老师并不是读了福柯的书以后,从福柯那里借来一种方法,而是不自觉地运用了类似的方式。
The works of Professor Hong Zi-cheng are big and small. We constantly obtain the knowledge-based stimuli and methodological revelations from his writings. The quiet, restrained, delicate and clean style is clearly distinguished from the contemporary ones that are often exasperated to close coma comment. He turned contemporary literary criticism into contemporary literature research, making contemporary literary studies a true academic research personality. Someone once said that Professor Hung’s approach is similar to that of Foucault’s Archetypal Archeology, but instead of borrowing a book from Foucault, Master Hung did not borrow a book from Foucault, but unconsciously applied a similar the way.