论文部分内容阅读
司法裁判过程中三段论式的法律推理不能自动保证作为法律推理的大小前提的正确性与妥当性,但是通过法律论证方法的介入,在法官、当事人、代理人、辩护人等诉讼主体对作为大前提的审判规范以及作为小前提的法律事实进行充分的阐述、论证的基础上,尽量达到使各方及公众能够接受认可的程度。而后,法官再依据已证成的大小前提,在遵循一般的形式逻辑规则的前提下,就可以推演出相对唯一正确的裁判结论。
The legal reasoning of the syllogism in judicial adjudication can not automatically guarantee the correctness and validity of the premise of the size of legal reasoning. However, through the intervention of legal argumentation methods, it is a prerequisite for the litigants such as judges, parties, agents and defenders Trial norms and as a prerequisite for the legal facts to fully elaborate on the basis of argument, as far as possible to enable all parties and the public to accept the degree of acceptance. Then, on the premise of the proven size and premise, the judge can deduce the relatively only correct conclusion of the verdict on the premise of following the general rules of formal logic.