本文主要针对1884年发生的海难吃人案,从道德、法经济学以及期待可能性等多个角度进行分析和讨论,进一步辨明罪与非罪的界限,也从一个侧面揭示司法和舆论之间的矛盾,明确司法和经济学政治学之间的区别,同时也为司法行为的改进提供一个方向和参考依据。 This article mainly analyzes and discusses the sea-food-eating cases that took place in 1884, analyzes and discusses from the perspectives of morality, law and economics and the possibility of expectation, further distinguishes the boundary between sin and non-sin, and reveals the relationship between justice and public opinion from one side The differences between judicial science and economics politics are clarified, at the same time it provides a direction and reference for the improvement of judicial action.