一目前,诉讼法学界关于讼诉证据的性质或特征的争论,主要表现为所谓“二性说”和“三性说”之争,而且争论主要在刑事证据的范围内进行。在这里,本文首先就这两种观点及其论证做些必要的分析。不管是“二性说”还是“三性说”的论者都认为“客观性”和“相关性”是我国诉讼证据(或刑事证据)的基本特征或本质特征,而且论证基本相同。从他们的论述中可以发现,无 At present, the controversy over the nature or characteristics of procedural evidence in litigation jurisprudence mainly manifests itself in the dispute between so-called “two sexes” and “three sexes”, and the debate mainly proceeds within the scope of criminal evidence. Here, this article first makes some necessary analysis on these two viewpoints and their arguments. Both the “two sexes” or the “three sexes” argued that “objectivity” and “relativity” are the basic characteristics or essential features of the evidence (or criminal evidence) of litigation in our country, and the arguments are basically the same. From their discourse can be found, no