根据2012年《民事诉讼法》第56条,在确定起诉人是否具有第三人撤销之诉的原告适格时,除了依据第3款规定的起诉要件进行审查,还要看其是否属于第1款、第2款规定的第三人。按照不少学者的理解,在我国,有独立请求权第三人和无独立请求权第三人的范围都很有限,不能圆满涵盖立法者期望通过第三人撤销之诉救济的虚假诉讼、恶意诉讼受害人。这种情况下,如何在立法者意图与规范文本之间取舍、衡平,就成为难题。研读新法颁行后的裁判文书可以发 Pursuant to Article 56 of the Civil Procedure Code 2012, in determining the suitability of the plaintiff for the prosecution’s withdrawal from the third party, in addition to examining the elements of prosecution under paragraph 3, it also depends on whether it is the first Paragraph 3, the third person. According to many scholars’ understanding, in our country, the scope of the third party with independent claim and the third party without independent claim is very limited, and can not satisfactorily cover the fake lawsuit that lawmakers expect to get relief from the third party. Litigation victim. Under these circumstances, it becomes a problem how to choose and balance the legislature’s intention and the normative text. After reading the new law, the verdict can be issued