论文部分内容阅读
原刑诉法175条规定:人民检察院可以不派员出席适用简易程序审理的公诉案件。新刑诉法第210条将原刑诉法175条修改为:人民检察院应当派检察员出席适用简易程序审理的公诉案件,其刑事立法依据是基于检察院法律监督职能、三机关相互关系、司法公正等因素的考虑。最高人民检察院公诉厅下发《关于进一步加强适用简易程序审理的公诉案件出庭工作通知》,要求新刑诉法正式实施前,各级检察机关要积极配合法院,增加适用简易程序审理公诉案件的出庭率。人民检察院派员出庭支持公诉,其存在争议的真正原因是司法公正和效率的价值协调与矛盾,应对基层司法处境现状保持应有的关注;在该刑事法条在司法适用中,要对司法公正和效率之间存在问题给予正确的理解和协调,方能更好地维护社会的公平和正义,同时又能提高司法活动的效率。
Article 175 of the original Criminal Procedure Law stipulates that people’s procuratorates may not send staff to attend public prosecution cases that apply summary proceedings. Article 210 of the new Criminal Procedure Law amends Section 175 of the original Criminal Procedure Law to read as follows: The People’s Procuratorate shall send an inspector to attend public prosecution cases for summary proceedings. Its criminal legislation is based on the legal supervision function of the procuratorate, the interdependence of the three agencies and the judicial impartiality Other factors to consider. The Public Prosecution Office of the Supreme People’s Procuratorate issued the Notice on Appearing in Court to Further Strengthen the Trial of Summary Proceedings and required the procuratorates at various levels to actively cooperate with the court and increase the trial of public prosecution cases in favor of summary proceedings rate. People’s Procuratorate dispatched to court to support the prosecution, the real reason for its controversy is the value of justice and efficiency of the coordination and contradictions, the status quo should be maintained at the grassroots judicial attention should be; in the criminal law in the judicial application of judicial justice And the efficiency of the problems between the correct understanding and coordination, in order to better safeguard social fairness and justice, while improving the efficiency of judicial activities.