文艺批评标准是衡量文艺作品思想艺术价值的尺度,它反映着各个社会发展阶段中的各个阶级、各个阶层、各种倾向的人们的世界观、艺术观。文艺史上许多批评家、文艺家为它展开过激烈的争论。近几年来,我国文艺界对这个问题也在进一步探讨,但至今似乎尚无一致的看法。我认为只要细心体会马克思主义经典文论,是一定可以从中得到深刻的启发,并逐步求得统一的认识的。本文拟就这个问题讲一讲个人学习马恩文论——间或也涉及列宁、斯大林的论述——时的肤浅体会,以就正于专家与读者同志们。 The standard of literary criticism is a measure of the artistic value of literary and artistic works. It reflects the world view and artistic view of all classes, walks of life and people with different tendencies in all stages of social development. Many critics and artists in the history of literature and art started fierce arguments for it. In recent years, the literary and art circles in our country have also conducted further discussions on this issue. However, there seems to be no consensus so far. I think as long as I carefully understand Marxist classical literary theory, I am sure I can get profound inspiration from it and gradually seek a unified understanding. This article is intended to address this issue as an explanation of personal learning of the Man Enron theory - sometimes also involving Lenin and Stalin - in the face of the expert and reader comrades.