论文部分内容阅读
从反垄断立法和执法的历史来看,美国较早地提出并建成了联邦与州两个层面的反托拉斯法执法体制机制。美国反垄断的执法经验表明,反垄断法的有效实施不能仅靠中央层面执法机构的推动,还必须调动地方执法机构的积极性,使中央与地方反垄断执法机构紧密配合,才能促进有效的市场竞争和保护消费者利益的反垄断立法目的。我国反垄断法已实施十年,从整体来看,反垄断执法的案件数量不大,地方执法机构反垄断执法的积极性不高,严重影响我国反垄断法的实施效果。为此,需明确地方执法机构的执法权,构建中央与地方反垄断执法协作机制,建立特定机制,确保反垄断法基本价值融入地方立法。
From the history of antitrust legislation and law enforcement, the United States earlier proposed and built the antitrust law enforcement system and mechanism at the federal and state levels. The anti-monopoly law enforcement experience in the United States shows that the effective implementation of the anti-monopoly law can not be promoted solely by the law enforcement agencies at the central level. It is also necessary to mobilize the enthusiasm of local law enforcement agencies so that the central and local anti-monopoly law enforcement agencies work closely together to promote effective market competition And antitrust legislation aimed at protecting the interests of consumers. As a whole, the number of antitrust enforcement cases is not large and the enthusiasm of local law enforcement agencies in antitrust enforcement is not high, which seriously affects the implementation effect of antitrust law in our country. To this end, it is necessary to clearly enforce the law enforcement powers of local law enforcement agencies, establish a coordination mechanism for anti-monopoly law enforcement between the central government and local governments, and establish a specific mechanism to ensure that the basic value of the anti-monopoly law is incorporated into local legislation.