【摘 要】
:
Background: Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder stenting (ETGBS) has been used as an alternative to percutaneous cholecystostomy in patients with acute cholecystitis who are considered unfit for surgery. However, there are few data on the efficacy and s
【机 构】
:
Division of Biliopancreas,Department of Internal Medicine,Wonkwang University College of Medicine an
论文部分内容阅读
Background: Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder stenting (ETGBS) has been used as an alternative to percutaneous cholecystostomy in patients with acute cholecystitis who are considered unfit for surgery. However, there are few data on the efficacy and safety of ETGBS replacement of percutaneous cholecys- tostomy in high-risk surgical patients. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of ETGBS to replace percutaneous cholecystostomy in high-risk surgical patients. Methods: This single center retrospective study reviewed the data of patients who attempted ETGBS to replace percutaneous cholecystostomy between January 2017 and September 2019. The technical success, clinical success, adverse events, and stent patency were evaluated. Results: ETGBS was performed in 43 patients (24 male, mean age 80.7 ± 7.4 years) to replace percu- taneous cholecystostomy due to high surgical risk. The technical success rate and clinical success rate were 97.7% (42/43) and 90.5% (38/42), respectively. Procedure-related adverse events and stent-related late adverse events occurred in 7.0% (3/43) and 11.6% (5/43), respectively. Of the patients who success- fully underwent ETGBS ( n = 42), only one had recurrent acute cholecystitis during follow-up. The median stent patency was 415 days (interquartile range 240–528 days). Conclusions: ETGBS, as a secondary intervention for the purpose of internalizing gallbladder drainage in patients following placement of a percutaneous cholecystostomy, is safe, effective, and technically feasi- ble. Thus, conversion of percutaneous cholecystostomy to ETGBS may be considered as a viable option in high-risk surgical patients.
其他文献
阿尔茨海默病(AD)是一种以痴呆为主要表现的神经系统退行性疾病,目前尚无法治愈,早期诊断并控制疾病进展,对于提高患者的生活质量,减轻社会负担意义重大。眼动跟踪(eye-tracking)通过记录人在处理视觉信息时的眼球运动轨迹和瞳孔变化等特征,可以收集研究对象在视觉认知方面的重要信息。AD患者眼球运动的异常不仅与大脑功能区的病理结构改变有关,也反映了患者认知功能的衰退。目前认为AD特征性的眼动变化与其病理改变相符合,可以辅助AD的早期诊断和临床鉴别诊断。本文梳理了近年来关于AD的眼动追踪的相关研究,包括基
目的探讨紫杉醇涂层球囊与普通球囊对冠状动脉小血管病变的临床治疗效果。方法选取120例冠状动脉小血管病变(血管直径≤2.75mm)患者,随机分为观察组(紫杉醇涂层球囊,n=60)和对照组(普通球囊,n=60),在术前、术后及随访中对冠状动脉小血管病变患者冠状动脉血管造影,并考察其晚期管腔丢失与二次狭窄率。术后随访25周,考察各组靶血管衰竭事件发生率。结果冠脉小血管病变患者在术后血管造影结果表明,观察组的二次狭窄率(26.8%,15/56)较对照组(50.0%,29/58)更低(P<0.05)。随访25
Dear Members,rnDear Colleagues,rnDear Friends,rnIt is our great pleasure and honor to invite you to particpate in the 5th International Congress of the iLDLT Group that will take place in Brussels on Friday October 15 and Saturday 16, 2021.rnThis event wi
目的 分析颈动脉校正血流时间(FTc)在ICU重症患者血容量评估中的价值.方法 选取76例血容量不足患者作为观察组,选取同期健康体检的健康者76例为对照组.根据观察组患者补液前后的颈总动脉频谱,分析观察组患者在补液前后的收缩期时间、心动周期、平均动脉压、心率、阻力指数、校正血流时间、血氨基末端脑钠肽前体的平均值等;分析对照组的平均动脉压、心率、阻力指数、校正血流时间;比较两组患者差异;Pearson法分析FTc与平均动脉压、心率、阻力指数等的相关性;分析△FTc与△入量的相关性.结果 观察组患者补液前后的
Hepatobiliary malignancies are highly heterogeneous with poor prognosis and drug response [1] . It is difficult to diagnose at an early stage. Hence, precise molecular targets are urgently needed to improve the diagnose efficacy and individual treatment r
Tumor growth requires oxygen and nutrient supplementation through angiogenesis from preexisting vascular beds. Hepatocellu- lar carcinoma (HCC) is a hyper-vascularized tumor with a predomi- nant arterial blood flow. Therefore, targeting angiogenesis is es
To the Editor:rnOver the years, the shortage of suitable donor organs has chal- lenged the transplant community in performing life-saving liver transplantation (LT). Recent reports from European and American liver transplant registries show persistently h
To the Editor:rnIn the last decade, next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based molecular profiling has shed light on the molecular landscape of biliary tract cancer (BTC), revealing the presence of several poten- tially actionable mutations [1] . According to
To the Editor:rnHepatitis A and hepatitis E are acute infectious diseases caused by hepatitis A virus (HAV) and hepatitis E virus (HEV), which are mainly transmitted through the fecal-oral route [1] . The early clin- ical symptoms of patients with hepatit