论文部分内容阅读
对RDA及《中国文献编目规则》的学位论文著录相应条款进行对比分析,旨在了解《中国文献编目规则》对RDA的适应性。对比主要针对学位论文的一般文献类型标识、著录详简级次、著录信息源、特殊细节附注项、题名与责任说明项等部分。对比结果表明,《中国文献编目规则》与RDA存在差异,但两者差异并不是很大,学位论文应用RDA著录是可行的。
The corresponding clauses of RDA and Chinese Cataloging Rules are comparatively analyzed to understand the adaptability of Chinese Cataloging Rules to RDA. The dissertation mainly compares the general literature type identification, the descriptive summary level, the source of the descriptive information, the notes of the special details, the title and the description of the responsibility mainly for the dissertations. The comparison results show that there is a difference between the Chinese Cataloging Rules and RDA, but the difference between the two is not very large. It is feasible that the dissertation is written by RDA.