拜读贵刊 1999年第 3期《医疗差错法医学鉴定》一文 ,获益匪浅 ,并且受到启发 ,对文中列举的例 1、例 2两案例的法医学鉴定结论产生了不同看法 ,从探讨学术观点出发 ,谈点个人不成熟意见 ,旨在抛砖引玉 ,供大家商榷。一、对案例的疑点1 例 1　同时诊断败血症、伤寒 ,不符合临床 Read your magazine 1999 third issue of “medical error forensic identification” article, benefited a lot, and be inspired, listed in the text of the cases 1 and 2 cases of forensic expert conclusions have different views from the academic point of view , Talk about personal immature opinions, designed to start a discussion, for your discussion. First, the case of doubt 1 case at the same time the diagnosis of sepsis, typhoid fever, does not meet the clinical