论文部分内容阅读
针对《庄子·逍遥游》“野马”、“尘埃”为一物还是两物的争论,以王叔岷《庄子校释》“野马”、“尘埃”是一物为参照,指出其古籍注解之方法存在的问题;又运用语言学之语法相关理论,考察了《庄子·內篇》时代判断句“A也,B也,C也”的主语和谓语分布情況,得出A、B为主语,C为谓语的结论,进而证实“野马”、“尘埃”当为两物。
For the controversy of “Zhuangzi Getaway” “Wild Horse ” and “Dust ” as one thing or two things, it takes Wang Shumin’s “Zhuangzi School Notes”, “Mustang”, “Dust” as a reference , Points out the problems existing in the method of annotation of ancient books, and applies the grammatical theory of linguistics to investigate the distribution of subject and predicate in the judgment sentences of “A, B and C also” in the era of Zhuangzi. Come to A, B as the subject, C is the predicate conclusion, thus confirming “Mustang ” “dust ” as two things.