论文部分内容阅读
黑格尔把现实理解为具有本质的实存,而后期谢林则批判黑格尔的“现实”概念是本质对实存的贬低或否定。施蒂纳沿着后期谢林的思路,从个人实存出发,展开对普遍本质的批判。马克思通过施蒂纳而受到后期谢林的影响,从思辨走向实证,把现实理解为经验的实存,并且更加关注个人,从而实现了马克思思想的革命性转变。但马克思并未因此放弃普遍本质,在个人实存必须在普遍本质之中实现自身这一点上,马克思比施蒂纳更接近于黑格尔。
Hegel interpreted the reality as the essence of existence, while the later “Critique” of Hegel criticized Hegel’s concept of “reality” as a derogatory or negative essence. Strathna along the late Schelling’s thinking, starting from the personal reality, to start the critique of the universal nature. Marx was influenced by later Xie Lin through Shi Tina, went from speculation to positivism, understood reality as existent experience, and paid more attention to individual, so as to realize the revolutionary transformation of Marx’s thought. However, Marx did not give up the universal nature and thus Marx was closer to Hegel than Stättin in the point that his personal reality must be realized in the universal nature.