论文部分内容阅读
随着2008年住房和城乡建设部令第166号《建筑起重机械安全监督管理规定》和建质[2008]76号《建筑起重机械备案登记办法》、建质[2008]75号《建筑施工特种作业人员管理办法》等相关规定的出台,近年来,各地也分别制定了加强建筑起重机械安全监督管理的一些规定,对于规范建筑起重机械管理、预防建筑起重机械安全事故发生起到了一定的积极作用。但是有些地方规定也存在着形式主义、地方保护、重复注册、乱收费等不合理现象和不切实际的要求,出现在建筑起重机械监督管理中“各自为政”、“一地多政”乃至权力寻租的现象,对于
With the 2008 Ministry of Housing and Urban Construction Order No. 166 “Construction Machinery Safety Supervision and Management Regulations” and the construction of “quality” [2008] No. 76 “Construction Crane Registration,” No. 75 [2008] “Construction In recent years, various localities also formulated some regulations on strengthening the safety supervision and management of construction crane respectively, which are of great significance for regulating the construction crane management and preventing the occurrence of construction crane safety accidents To a certain positive effect. However, in some localities there are also unreasonable demands and unrealistic requirements of formalism, local protection, repeated registrations, indiscriminate charges, etc., which appear in the supervision and administration of construction crane machinery. ”And even the phenomenon of rent-seeking power, for