论文部分内容阅读
《行政诉讼法》第17条对行政诉讼案件的一般地域管辖作了如下规定:“行政案件由最初作出具体行政行为的行政机关所在地法院管辖;经复议的案件,复议机关改变原具体行政行为的,也可以由复议机关所在地法院管辖。这个制度看似合理,但我们深究则会发现作为审理案件的被告所在地法院因其财政人事均受到行政机关的制约,严重影响了审判的积极性和司法的权威性,而提级管辖,异地交叉管辖都是有益的探索和尝试。而最终的和最彻底的办法就是建立行政法院。
Article 17 of the Code of Administrative Procedure stipulates the general geographic jurisdiction of administrative litigation cases as follows: ”Administrative cases are governed by the courts of the locality where the administrative organ that originally made the concrete administrative act is located; in the reconsidered case, the reviewing organ changes the original concrete administrative act Or may be governed by the court in the place where the review office is located.This system seems plausible but we will find that the court where the accused is the case is the subject of administrative restrictions on the part of the accused because of its handling of the case and seriously affect the motivation and judicial Authoritative, and the promotion of jurisdiction, cross-jurisdictional jurisdiction is beneficial to explore and try.The final and most thorough way is to establish an administrative court.